<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Simone Carletti&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog</link>
	<description>Simone Carletti&#039;s personal ramblings on programming, syndication, search engines &#38; marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:13:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unobtrusive JavaScript in Rails 3 by Marlin Pierce</title>
		<link>http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/2010/06/unobtrusive-javascript-in-rails-3/#comment-40597</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlin Pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/?p=1105#comment-40597</guid>
		<description>Let me be clear up front that this was a great article; it was very helpful; it was in fact the definitive statement which convinced us that we needed to exclude prototype and Rails prototype helpers in our non-legacy development.

However, I did not find the justification for Rails switching from prototype to jQuery convincing.  The observer example was not less verbose.  I don&#039;t see an advantage of Rails being no longer prototype oriented.  I don&#039;t consider using jQuery to be framework agnostic, as it depends on the jQuery framework.

Maybe I am missing that, unlike the prototype support, Rails is decoupled from jQuery, as it does not have jQuery dependent helpers.  Maybe that&#039;s it.  I was not happy when I first learned Rails that it was prototype dependent.  However, once using it, taking it away is a decision I disagree with.

I also disagree that it&#039;s a positive that the jQuery way, forces developers to have a deeper JavaScript knowledge than in the past.  There are a number of systems to gloss over JavaScript, gwt, extJS, and jQuery.  JavaScript is a little clunky, and the DOM api is definitely clunky.

My hope would be that a JS gloss framework became so popular that it was incorporated natively in browsers.  For instance, observers could be added to the JavaScript foundation.  Rails selection of prototype, brings prototype almost to a justifiable standard as a candidate for such inclusion.  Abandoning prototype, and switching frameworks undermines this hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me be clear up front that this was a great article; it was very helpful; it was in fact the definitive statement which convinced us that we needed to exclude prototype and Rails prototype helpers in our non-legacy development.</p>
<p>However, I did not find the justification for Rails switching from prototype to jQuery convincing.  The observer example was not less verbose.  I don&#8217;t see an advantage of Rails being no longer prototype oriented.  I don&#8217;t consider using jQuery to be framework agnostic, as it depends on the jQuery framework.</p>
<p>Maybe I am missing that, unlike the prototype support, Rails is decoupled from jQuery, as it does not have jQuery dependent helpers.  Maybe that&#8217;s it.  I was not happy when I first learned Rails that it was prototype dependent.  However, once using it, taking it away is a decision I disagree with.</p>
<p>I also disagree that it&#8217;s a positive that the jQuery way, forces developers to have a deeper JavaScript knowledge than in the past.  There are a number of systems to gloss over JavaScript, gwt, extJS, and jQuery.  JavaScript is a little clunky, and the DOM api is definitely clunky.</p>
<p>My hope would be that a JS gloss framework became so popular that it was incorporated natively in browsers.  For instance, observers could be added to the JavaScript foundation.  Rails selection of prototype, brings prototype almost to a justifiable standard as a candidate for such inclusion.  Abandoning prototype, and switching frameworks undermines this hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Configuring Rails 3 to use HTTPS and SSL by fearless_fool</title>
		<link>http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/2011/05/configuring-rails-3-https-ssl/#comment-40590</link>
		<dc:creator>fearless_fool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/?p=1447#comment-40590</guid>
		<description>Simone (et al): Great article and comments!

How do I configure things in Rails 3.1 so that http://mysite.com redirects to https://secure.mysite.com?  

Specifically, I&#039;m running Rails 3.1 on the Cedar stack on Heroku, using Hostname Based SSL.  My SSL certs are set up for secure.mysite.com (and Heroku documents state that you can&#039;t use HTTPS on a TLD anyway).  My hunch is that simply calling force_ssl in my ApplicationController won&#039;t have the right effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simone (et al): Great article and comments!</p>
<p>How do I configure things in Rails 3.1 so that <a href="http://mysite.com" rel="nofollow">http://mysite.com</a> redirects to <a href="https://secure.mysite.com?" rel="nofollow">https://secure.mysite.com?</a>  </p>
<p>Specifically, I&#8217;m running Rails 3.1 on the Cedar stack on Heroku, using Hostname Based SSL.  My SSL certs are set up for secure.mysite.com (and Heroku documents state that you can&#8217;t use HTTPS on a TLD anyway).  My hunch is that simply calling force_ssl in my ApplicationController won&#8217;t have the right effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google changes the maximum number of users for Google Apps by Simone Carletti</title>
		<link>http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/2011/04/google-changes-the-maximum-number-of-users-for-google-apps/#comment-40589</link>
		<dc:creator>Simone Carletti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/?p=1442#comment-40589</guid>
		<description>Yes, if you delete the account the allocation can be reused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, if you delete the account the allocation can be reused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google changes the maximum number of users for Google Apps by Pranav</title>
		<link>http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/2011/04/google-changes-the-maximum-number-of-users-for-google-apps/#comment-40588</link>
		<dc:creator>Pranav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/?p=1442#comment-40588</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I have registered with google apps and i shall like to know if I delete one email account from 10 free allotted quota, will I be able to reuse it again. 
eg - if i have made one account out of 10 and later i delete it, will i get back 10 free accounts again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I have registered with google apps and i shall like to know if I delete one email account from 10 free allotted quota, will I be able to reuse it again.<br />
eg &#8211; if i have made one account out of 10 and later i delete it, will i get back 10 free accounts again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on rake console: a custom irb instance for your Ruby GEM by danfunk</title>
		<link>http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/2009/09/rake-console/#comment-40586</link>
		<dc:creator>danfunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/?p=615#comment-40586</guid>
		<description>short and sweet.  Well written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>short and sweet.  Well written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apache RewriteRule and query string by Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/2009/01/apache-rewriterule-and-query-string/#comment-40585</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/?p=135#comment-40585</guid>
		<description>I am trying to give each MOVIE there own url name, for example, www.helloworld.com/BATMAN. I have been using mod_rewrite to create such url. I have been using following htaccess code to achieve such result.

 RewriteEngine ON
 RewriteCond %(REQUEST_FILENAME) !-d
 RewriteCond %(REQUEST_FILENAME) !-f
 RewriteCond %(REQUEST_FILENAME) !-l

 RewriteRule ^(.*)$ index.php?url=$1 [QSA,L]

The mod_rewrite works perfectly. When A user enters randam movie name (name that does not exist in database), for example, www.helloworld.com/abcd, I have created a url redirect which is www.helloworld.com/oopsmovienotfound.php. This works fine too. But the problem I am having is this: When user click www.helloworld.com/login.php .The url keeps looping between login.php and oopsmovienotfound.php OR the url is forwarded to www.helloworld.com/oopsmovienotfound.php beacause database doesnot have &quot;login.php&quot; as a movie name. I thought this command

 RewriteCond %(REQUEST_FILENAME) !-f 

should have take care of this but its not. Please help. Thank you in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to give each MOVIE there own url name, for example, <a href="http://www.helloworld.com/BATMAN" rel="nofollow">http://www.helloworld.com/BATMAN</a>. I have been using mod_rewrite to create such url. I have been using following htaccess code to achieve such result.</p>
<p> RewriteEngine ON<br />
 RewriteCond %(REQUEST_FILENAME) !-d<br />
 RewriteCond %(REQUEST_FILENAME) !-f<br />
 RewriteCond %(REQUEST_FILENAME) !-l</p>
<p> RewriteRule ^(.*)$ index.php?url=$1 [QSA,L]</p>
<p>The mod_rewrite works perfectly. When A user enters randam movie name (name that does not exist in database), for example, <a href="http://www.helloworld.com/abcd" rel="nofollow">http://www.helloworld.com/abcd</a>, I have created a url redirect which is <a href="http://www.helloworld.com/oopsmovienotfound.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.helloworld.com/oopsmovienotfound.php</a>. This works fine too. But the problem I am having is this: When user click <a href="http://www.helloworld.com/login.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.helloworld.com/login.php</a> .The url keeps looping between login.php and oopsmovienotfound.php OR the url is forwarded to <a href="http://www.helloworld.com/oopsmovienotfound.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.helloworld.com/oopsmovienotfound.php</a> beacause database doesnot have &#8220;login.php&#8221; as a movie name. I thought this command</p>
<p> RewriteCond %(REQUEST_FILENAME) !-f </p>
<p>should have take care of this but its not. Please help. Thank you in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Understanding Ruby and Rails: Lazy load hooks by Simone Carletti</title>
		<link>http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/2011/04/understanding-ruby-and-rails-lazy-load-hooks/#comment-40581</link>
		<dc:creator>Simone Carletti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/?p=1426#comment-40581</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right. Fixed, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right. Fixed, thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Understanding Ruby and Rails: Lazy load hooks by Nathan B</title>
		<link>http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/2011/04/understanding-ruby-and-rails-lazy-load-hooks/#comment-40580</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/?p=1426#comment-40580</guid>
		<description>Was just wondering, in the last block, should `puts &quot;The color is #{@color}&quot;` be `puts &quot;The color is #{@name}&quot;`?

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was just wondering, in the last block, should `puts &#8220;The color is #{@color}&#8221;` be `puts &#8220;The color is #{@name}&#8221;`?</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unobtrusive JavaScript in Rails 3 by Dan Garland</title>
		<link>http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/2010/06/unobtrusive-javascript-in-rails-3/#comment-40579</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Garland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/?p=1105#comment-40579</guid>
		<description>&quot;Placing a javascript_tag in the middle of a page is probably not so unobtrusive&quot;

It defeats the purpose as far as I can tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Placing a javascript_tag in the middle of a page is probably not so unobtrusive&#8221;</p>
<p>It defeats the purpose as far as I can tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unobtrusive JavaScript in Rails 3 by Daniel X. Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/2010/06/unobtrusive-javascript-in-rails-3/#comment-40578</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel X. Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/?p=1105#comment-40578</guid>
		<description>I think that &#039;ajax:failure&#039; has been replaced with &#039;ajax:error&#039;. See source here: https://github.com/rails/jquery-ujs/blob/82292010fb1743f038ab72b1f1e994e91be3eda3/src/rails.js#L148</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that &#8216;ajax:failure&#8217; has been replaced with &#8216;ajax:error&#8217;. See source here: <a href="https://github.com/rails/jquery-ujs/blob/82292010fb1743f038ab72b1f1e994e91be3eda3/src/rails.js#L148" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/rails/jquery-ujs/blob/82292010fb1743f038ab72b1f1e994e91be3eda3/src/rails.js#L148</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

